Dune: Part Two movie review
Dune: Part Two movie review – Denis Villeneuve's pacier follow-up is effective as long as it harnesses the desert power
Dune: Part Two movie review – Timothee Chalamet and Zendaya-starrer moves ahead far more swiftly after the first part's glacial worldbuilding.
Harnessing the desert power
Eclipsed by its own loftiness
These are distinctly brilliant scenes, but they're far and few in this 2-hour-46-minute saga. Besides a few well-choreographed action scenes, most of Dune: Part Two shares the same issues as its predecessor – it stretches its vision so high to measure its lofty ideas that it ends up falling back with a thud. Paul's central conflict of whether he should believe in the prophecy and posture as a messiah or dismiss it and grow organically like one of the people takes some tadpole leaps, but it's unable to maintain a steady graph.
Timothee gets more of a range to perform here. He's well-cast as a young boy on whom greatness has been imposed – but his static face and body language are unable to bear the weight of what the story demands him to convey. Zendaya as Chani is his voice of reason. She gets some moments to shine, but isn't given the equal treatment that we were talking about earlier. Javier Bardem gets to have some fun with his accent and comic timing, and Stellan Skasgard is busy chilling like he did in the first part, but what's the rest of the seasoned cast doing anyway?
For instance, Dave Bautista and Josh Brolin, who were expected to have more to do in this part, are pushed to the sidelines yet again. Bautista is in full WWE form and screaming his lungs out, and his final showdown with Josh ends within the blink of an eye after a fairly long build-up. It's the same case with Timothee's Paul and Austin Butler's Feyd-Rautha. Their duel at the end is delicious, but not worthy of the hype built ever since the latter's entry at the half-mark. Co-writers Denis and John Spaihts could've dedicated more time to these young actors wrestling it out, but they're more interested in foreplay than climax.
Which brings me to Hans Zimmer's score. Yes, it's all grand and ominous. But what's it pointing to? The stakes of the screenplay are unable to sync with the sense of foreboding the score invokes. Sure, something life-altering, universe-shifting is going to happen – but when? With new characters introduced, Paul beginning to own his prophecy, and Chani resolving to go against him, there's a third part in the offing. Can we then expect Denis to drum up the drama, instead of only the sound and scale that are supposed to aid the drama? If not, we need a prophecy and messianic intervention right away.
Comments
Post a Comment